Saturday, September 28, 2013

Protect Your Legacy


In today’s blog I wanted to discuss the topic of entertainment law. In starting a business it is important to have a basic understanding of the laws associated within your industry to avoid liability issues in the future. During my research, to grasp a better understanding of the laws surrounding the cultural arts industry, I learned how important it is to have a clear understanding of how to protect your business and yourself from future suits. In my research I also came across a few podcasts from industry experts, within the entertainment field, who shared insight and tips on how to avoid issues such as copyright infringement, trademark and liability issues. Although, most business owners may deem it useless to research these topics and may prefer to hire an attorney to handle such matters on their behalf, and they would be correct. It is also important to have a basic understanding of what and how the laws of your industry will impact your business. It could be the saving factor of your future legacy.

When it comes to protecting your brand it is key to have a clear idea of what your brand is, and the brand message you are portraying if you plan to trademark any component of your business. In the podcast ‘When a foot is only 11 inches, and a Batmobile is a character’ by Gordon P. Firemark, he discusses the importance of not having a deceptive description for your business product or service, when looking to trademark. An example he uses is the process Subway has been going through in trying to trademark the ‘footlong sub’ tagline. Subway has not been able to trademark due to other competitors citing the use of description for Subway subs is deceptive according to trademark law, and can be misleading. In order for the company to receive trademark, Subway will need to provide a clearer, distinctive, description of their product in which the company wants to trademark. According to trademark law, in order to serve as a trademark, a mark must be distinctive (Harvard, 2013). The issue with Subway was other competitors argued any sub is a footlong, and any company selling a sub is selling a footlong sub, therefore the tagline ‘footlong sub’ would be confusing as a trademark. The key when it comes to qualifying for trademark is to make sure you have a clear, and distinctive, mark.

The next big issue in entertainment law is copyright infringement. Unfortunately, many companies create material, or works, that become infringed upon by others. By having an understanding of how to copyright your work, you can protect yourself and your work from being misused. However, on the other side it is just as important to know the correct process in order to use copyrighted material. As a performing arts company, our goal is to produce recitals, shows, and events throughout the year. The majority of the work we produce may be previously produced, or copyrighted material, but we will also work to create original work. So, how do you know that when creating new work it is truly original, and not just a re-created version of something else? The Nutcracker has been reproduced by numerous dance schools and most recently has been re-created into “new work” such as the Hot Chocolate Nutcracker produced by Debbie Allen. Is it an infringement of copyright for Ms. Allen to have a play that resembles the original Nutcracker? In another podcasts by Firemark titled ‘No Copyright, Sherlock’, Firemark discusses several cases of copyright infringement of work used that is similar to previous copyrighted work. However, in most of those cases the court ruled no copyright infringement, as the works in question are not similar in scope and content of the original work, due to tiny changes in the material. So, I gather long as Ms. Allen’s play has differing factors that do not confuse the public with the original Nutcracker; there is no copyright issue.

The final topic of entertainment law reviewed in my research is intellectual property. Intellectual property refers to creations of the mind; inventions, literary and artistic work, and symbols, names, images, and designs used in commerce (WIPO, 2013). Intellectual property consists of patents, trademarks, and copyright work that require protecting. In the course of building a business, it is important to identify ‘what’ is your business’ intellectual property that will require protecting. In the podcasts ‘IP Law Concentration’ by Suffolk University Law School, professor Andrew Beckerman-Rodau discusses in detail and length intellectual property, and how to identify intellectual property within your business. The podcast gives good insight as to how each law related to intellectual property will affect your business.

The greatest takeaway during the research on entertainment law and intellectual property is the importance of having a basic, and comprehensive, understanding of the laws that affect your industry. Operating a business is not easy, and building a successful business takes work. Why not know how to protect your work, so that your efforts and legacy don’t die with you, or before you do. These are just my thoughts and hopefully it helps someone else.

Thanks for reading,

LaKesha, xo

Reference



Entertainment Law Update. Podcast by Gordon Firemark; Episode 38

No Copyright, Sherlock. Podcast by Gordon Firemark; Episode 43

IP Law Concentration. Podcast by Suffolk University Law School

Monday, September 9, 2013

Legal Issues in Performing Arts Reviewed



In my recent class this month, we are studying advanced entertainment law. Yes, advanced entertainment law! As daunting as it sounds to you, it sounded even more daunting to me, considering I had not even taken a law class before, nor have any clue about law. However, one week in and I am glad to be in this class so far.

As a business owner, especially in the entertainment industry, it is important to have a clear understanding of the basic law practices and knowledge regarding legal and copyright matters as it pertains to one’s business. Currently, we are researching top legal cases surrounding our specific industry to gain insight on some of the legal practices taking place. My specific industry within entertainment is performing arts culture.

Considering my specific industry, there are not many “recent” legal cases or legal issues, and/or lawsuits. In spite of the lack thereof, I was determined to find valuable documents of reported legal cases in order to gain insight into possible legal situations that could potentially arise in the arts and culture industry. In my search I came across a few articles I found interesting and worth taking note; and sharing with you.

In performing arts dancers can secure various types of jobs, with various companies. As a child, I use to want to dance for cruise ships, as the thought of being able to travel to different parts of the world and dance seemed magical to me. However, that dream did not come true. Yet, there are many dancers who have been fortunate enough to work for cruise lines, or have they? Performing for a cruise line does seem like the perfect job until one becomes injured. In a recent article I came across titled ‘No Jury Trial for Seriously Injured Dancer Aboard HAL’s Oosterdam’ I was a bit shocked at the legal issues in the case. Apparently, a dancer aboard the cruise line was injured by equipment on the ship, so severely, that he can no longer dance. Thus, ending his career. Despite the laws, such as the General Maritime Law of the U.S. and the Jones Act, stipulating injured crewmembers are allowed to bring their case before a jury; the dancer in this article was denied the right by the U.S. federal court to have his case against the cruise line and his employer brought before a jury trial, and instead sent to be reviewed in arbitration. According to the article, apparently it is cheaper and easier for a cruise line to settle any crewmember claims outside of a jury, therefore inserting terms in employee contracts that any claims must be through arbitration (Walker, 2013). This case is still being reviewed to date. However, I find it appalling that cruise line companies are using loop holes to cheapen their way out of responsibility to their employees. In the dance community, the loss of a limb is not only the loss of a career, but of a life that could have been.

In a similar case we see an ex-crewmember, with the Royal Caribbean cruise line, finding favor in arbitration, as the plaintiff is awarded the highest arbitration settlement of $1,250,000. For more info on this case visit Royal Caribbean Settlement . 

On the theatre side of the industry I came across a blog on Belhaven Theatre discussing recent legal issues over playwrights. The blog shares the conflicts and legal issues that arise when a writer and producer have discrepancies over the production of a play. A recent case highlighted in the blog details how playwright Bruce Norris refused to allow his Pulitzer prized play Clybourne Park go to production in Germany, as the producer intended to have non-black actors perform the African-American characters. This is not unusual of cases being brought to the courts over playwrights, due to producers altering or making changes to a production without the writers input, or consent.

After, reading through these articles and more I am beginning to see the necessity to under the various laws, as best possible, associated with my industry. It is only wise to do so in order to protect my business, my students, and myself. As well, be able to understand the legalities associated with using copyrighted material, especially when wanting to present a previous work.
Some may say leave the legal business to the lawyers, to which I agree, and some chose to think most deals, or contracts can be handled without legal guidance, but would you want to sign on a dotted line that could potentially be signing away your future?

Thanks for reading,

LaKesha, xo


Reference:
Frost, J. (2012). ‘Playwrights Intentions Defended’.  Belhaven Theatre. http://blogs.belhaven.edu/theatre/playwrights-intentions-defended/#.Ui6Mxhbw4_4
Walker, J. (2013).‘No Jury Trial for Seriously Injured Dancer Aboard HAL’s Oosterdam”. http://www.cruiselawnews.com/2013/01/articles/crew-member-rights-1/no-jury-trial-for-seriously-injured-dancer-aboard-hals-oosterdam/